Printing is not supported at the primary Gallery Thumbnail page. Please first navigate to a specific Image before printing.
-
The Write Stuff - Autumn 2019 (Vol.16, No.4)
Research Medical Library
- Scientific Publications and the Research Medical Library join forces, expand services
- Incorporating sex as a biological variable in NIH grant applications
- Hyperlinks in NIH grant applications
- Altmetrics: Looking beyond citation analysis to measure impact
- Guidelines for reporting your research methods to improve reproducibility and rigor
- Unusual terms used in scientific writing and publishing: Core Grant
-
The Write Stuff - Spring 2019 (Vol.16, No.2)
Research Medical Library
- Setting up a writing critique group
- NIH clarifies terminology regarding rigor of the prior research
- Scientific Publications’ grant proposal editing service
- European Plan S aims to mandate open access by 2020
- NIH tip: Check your funding opportunity announcement 30 days before submitting your grant application
- Unusual terms used in scientific writing and publishing: “Blinded” peer review and clinical trials
-
The Write Stuff - Winter 2019 (Vol.16, No.1)
Research Medical Library
- Grant Writers' seminars return in March
- How to disagree with an NIH research grant proposal review
- Using Publons to track and show peer reviews
- Journal initiatives aim to improve transparency and reproducibility
- New NIH videos demystify the grant review process
- NIH launches new version of NIH Data Book including 2018 funding statistics
- Unusual terms used in scientific writing and publishing: Sentence case and title case
