Abstract

Purpose To evaluate how deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) affects diagnostic image quality and noise characteristics at different radiation dose levels and how it influences dose optimization compared with conventional reconstruction methods.

Method A systematic review was conducted using major databases for studies published between 2020 and 2026. Eligible studies assessed DLIR across multiple dose levels, reported radiation dose, included quantitative image quality metrics, and compared DLIR with filtered back projection or iterative reconstruction.

Results Thirty‑seven studies met criteria, and 15 were synthesized. Three themes emerged: (a) DLIR reduced noise by 15–82% and often improved signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios while preserving spatial resolution; (b) dose reduction potential ranged from 20–90%, with some regions achieving 73–97%; and (c) heterogeneity in protocols and metrics limited consistency, although DLIR generally maintained diagnostic performance.

Discussion DLIR improved image quality by adapting to image content, reducing noise, and preserving spatial resolution across dose levels, supporting meaningful dose‑reduction opportunities. However, variation in study design, reconstruction settings, and reporting limits the ability to define reliable dose‑reduction thresholds, and the absence of prospective diagnostic accuracy studies restricts clinical certainty. Quantitative metrics may also overestimate performance relative to human observers, indicating that although DLIR shows promise, clinical adoption requires more rigorous validation and standardized evaluation methods.

Conclusion DLIR may support substantial radiation dose reductions without compromising diagnostic quality. Stronger prospective evidence and more consistent evaluation standards are needed before aggressive dose‑reduction strategies can be widely implemented.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.52519/00256

Graduation Date

Summer 8-7-2026

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Science in Radiologic Science

Program

The School of Health Professions

Faculty Advisor

Kevin R. Clark

Committee Member

Jessyca B. Wagner

Director, Graduate Program

William A. Undie

Dean

Kimberly Hoggatt Krumwiede

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.