Chapter 12: A View of New Collegial Leadership

Chapter 12: A View of New Collegial Leadership

Files

Loading...

Media is loading
 

Description

Dr. Podoloff begins this segment by observing that he didn’t seek his current job as Head of the Division of Radiology, but has built clinical program to handle the workload and is now working on developing the research program.

Next he observes that the recruitment of David Pimwica-Worms and Helen Pimwica Worms has been very positive for the institution. David Pimica-Worms, now Head of Diagnostic Imaging, brings a collegial leadership style that contrasts with Dr. Yuri Galivani’s “top down” approach.

Identifier

PodoloffD_01_20150402_C12

Publication Date

4-2-2015

City

Houston, Texas

Topics Covered

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center - Institutional Change; MD Anderson Culture; Building/Transforming the Institution; Growth and/or Change; Professional Practice; Leadership; Understanding the Institution; Portraits

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.

Disciplines

History of Science, Technology, and Medicine | Oncology | Oral History

Transcript

Tacey A. Rosolowski, PhD:

I wanted to circle back to what brought us onto this conversation, which is the technological advances. And so we were talking about the PET/CT.

Donald A. Podoloff, MD:

Yeah. Now the PET/CT had an impact almost as much as CT did. In a matter of a year to a year and a half, nobody was making PET scans anymore, they were only making PET/CT scans.

Tacey A. Rosolowski, PhD:

Wow. Was 2007, was that when it—

Donald A. Podoloff, MD:

I think the first papers came out in 2006 maybe. But that means they had been working on it probably for three to four years before that. Just nobody knew anything about it. It was always a dream, because as I told you, what we used to do in the old days is we’d have a CT over here and a PET scan over here. Our eyes would do the synthesis for us. But the first machine that actually did it—we didn’t get ours until around 2000.

Tacey A. Rosolowski, PhD:

Oh, really.

Donald A. Podoloff, MD:

Yeah, 2002, 2003 I think. Now Anderson has notoriously been very late into technology.

Tacey A. Rosolowski, PhD:

OK. So you got a PET/CT machine in 2002, 2003?

Donald A. Podoloff, MD:

We got our first PET scan in 1999.

Tacey A. Rosolowski, PhD:

Oh, first PET scan, OK.

Donald A. Podoloff, MD:

It was not really our first, it was our second. We actually had a PET program here from 1988 to ’94 but we had to close it.

Tacey A. Rosolowski, PhD:

Why was that?

Donald A. Podoloff, MD:

It was a huge economic drain on the institution.

Tacey A. Rosolowski, PhD:

Huh.

Donald A. Podoloff, MD:

And at that time PET was not reimbursable, so you couldn’t charge patients a clinical fee for doing it.

Tacey A. Rosolowski, PhD:

I see. So was that decision to close down the PET program purely financial? Or was it not demonstrating value in terms of care?

Donald A. Podoloff, MD:

Oh, it had nothing to do with science, it was purely—were you here in ’94?

Tacey A. Rosolowski, PhD:

No, I came in 2011.

Donald A. Podoloff, MD:

OK, so you’re relatively new. In 1994 we were told that in 1995 we’d be half our size. Managed care was coming, and it was going to destroy MD Anderson. And our leaders, being responsible humans, listened. And so they closed programs. And PET was one of the casualties of that.

Tacey A. Rosolowski, PhD:

OK, I do recall that period in the institution’s history.

Donald A. Podoloff, MD:

You’ve interviewed people who probably are still pissed off about that.

Tacey A. Rosolowski, PhD:

Yeah. I mean it was a painful time for the institution.

Donald A. Podoloff, MD:

Very. It was the first time that the institution ever had to do anything like that. And it was actually before ’94. It was more like ’92, ’93.

Tacey A. Rosolowski, PhD:

The Sharp report came out.

Donald A. Podoloff, MD:

Yeah, exactly. Where are they today, by the way?

Tacey A. Rosolowski, PhD:

Don’t know.

Donald A. Podoloff, MD:

Yeah. Where’s MD Anderson? They were all wrong. All those experts were wrong.

Tacey A. Rosolowski, PhD:

Oh, yeah, absolutely. Yeah, well, I mean when John Mendelsohn came he decided he was going to ignore that wisdom as nonwisdom, and grow the institution. And I think there are people who are still talking about the fact that a lot of the people who were let go during ’94, ’95 were hired back. So it was a very strange period. How do you tell which way the wind is going to blow?

Donald A. Podoloff, MD:

Yeah. It was a very serious miscalculation of what was going on. But it was the prevailing wisdom.

Tacey A. Rosolowski, PhD:

Absolutely.

Donald A. Podoloff, MD:

I remember J [Freireich] at that time was saying, “These guys are crazy. They’re going to have more patients than they know what to do with in five years.” And he was right.

Tacey A. Rosolowski, PhD:

Huh. Now is the reason that PET scans were not reimbursed at that time, was it a lack of information that was being provided to insurers?

Donald A. Podoloff, MD:

There was no clinical data that suggested that it was better than nothing. And it was very expensive. And it got its start in brain research. And then they started to do cancer work with it. The way PET got reimbursed was through a study done by a group who demonstrated to CMS—I don’t think it was called Medicare at that time, it was called CMS—that a PET scan—this is just plain PET—reduced futile thoracotomies by twenty percent, because it found a metastatic deposit somewhere that you—like an adrenal lesion or a bone lesion, which means you’re not an operable candidate anymore. Well, a thoracotomy was more expensive by far than doing a PET scan. And that’s why the government approved PET scanning for lung cancer.

Tacey A. Rosolowski, PhD:

Now was that study done at MD Anderson or someplace else?

Donald A. Podoloff, MD:

No. I don’t remember where it was done now. But it’s a very famous study. I probably have it in my slides. But that’s how PET started to get reimbursed. And now, well, it’s been a long time, but there are groups of people who are working very diligently on demonstrating that when you do this test you save money in the long run. And that’s really the only thing that the government—the government is not going to respond to well, the outcome is better and the patient feels better. They’re going to respond to the macroeconomics of the situation.

Tacey A. Rosolowski, PhD:

I’ve been talking to Linda Elting in Health Services Research. And it’s been a very interesting conversation about how providing this hard data to insurance companies makes an enormous difference. And I mean in her words she says insurers are not in the business of denying people care, they’re in the business of denying useless care. (laughter)

Donald A. Podoloff, MD:

Yes. But most insurance companies are for-profit organizations. And so their bottom line is they have to be profitable. Well, denying care that’s ineffective is a very good way to help that bottom line. But denying care that is effective is just as good a way of doing that.

Tacey A. Rosolowski, PhD:

Absolutely. So when did MD Anderson get its PET program back? You said 2002?

Donald A. Podoloff, MD:

I think we started it up again in 1999.

Tacey A. Rosolowski, PhD:

OK, 1999.

Donald A. Podoloff, MD:

I was given permission to recruit Homer Macapinlac here.

Tacey A. Rosolowski, PhD:

I’m sorry. His name?

Donald A. Podoloff, MD:

Homer Macapinlac. He’s the chair of nuclear medicine. And I recruited him from Sloan-Kettering. And I recruited Osama Mawlawi who’s a physicist. And they started the PET program for us. And very quickly we became the largest and most successful PET program in the United States, and still are. Nobody does seventy or eighty scans a day like we do.

Tacey A. Rosolowski, PhD:

Wow.

Donald A. Podoloff, MD:

I’m watching the time because I have something else that I need to do.

Tacey A. Rosolowski, PhD:

OK. Would you like to stop? Do you need some time to transition?

Donald A. Podoloff, MD:

No, I’m OK about transitioning. I want to leave you with a thought.

Tacey A. Rosolowski, PhD:

Sure.

Conditions Governing Access

Open

Chapter 12: A View of New Collegial Leadership

Share

COinS