The Impact of Fellowship Training on Peer-Reviewed Publication Productivity in Academic Anesthesiologists as Evaluated by the h-Index

Authors

• Acsa M. Zavala, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterFollow
• Jagtar Singh Heir, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterFollow
• Juan P. Cata, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterFollow
• Lei Feng, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterFollow
• Jose M. Soliz, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterFollow

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Background: The effect of anesthesiology fellowships on scholarly contributions has been minimally studied. In this study we analyzed differences in h-index between fellowship-trained and non–fellowship-trained anesthesiologists, as well as by type of fellowship, academic rank, and years in practice.

Methods: All anesthesiologists on staff between September 1, 2021, and August 31, 2022, were included in this study. The variables collected were fellowship training status, h-index, total number of publications, years in practice, academic rank, and years at the institution. For analysis, the anesthesiologists were divided into 2 groups: those with fellowship training and those without.

Results: Among 78 anesthesiologists, 40 were not fellowship-trained and 38 were, with 10 types of anesthesiology fellowships identified. The h-index and number of publications did not differ between fellowship-trained and non–fellowship-trained anesthesiologists, and the number of publications per years in practice did not differ by fellowship type. The number of publications per years in practice was higher in the fellowship-trained group than in the non–fellowship-trained group (1.2 ± 1.1 vs. 0.71 ± 0.6; P = .04), as was the number of publications per years in practice at our institution (1.5 ± 1.1 compared with 0.9 ± 0.9; P = .0093).

Conclusion: Fellowship training among academic anesthesiologists was not associated with a difference in h-index. However, fellowship training was associated with a higher number of publications per years in practice. Further research could elucidate the usefulness of h-index to support career development and contributions of anesthesiologists in academia.

PMCID

PMC12126212

DOI

https://doi.org/10.52519/ACEQI.25.1.1.a8

PubMed ID

40453771

Grants and Funding

P30 CA016672/CA/NCI NIH HHS

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.

Recommended Citation

Zavala AM, Singh Heir J, Cata JP, Feng L, Soliz JM. The Impact of Fellowship Training on Peer-Reviewed Publication Productivity in Academic Anesthesiologists as Evaluated by the h-Index. Advances in Cancer Education and Quality Improvement. 2025; 1(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.52519/ACEQI.25.1.1.a8.